From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. City of Fountain Valley Police Sgt. Mike Parsons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 27, 2020
Case No. 8:19-cv-0768-GW-JC (C.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 8:19-cv-0768-GW-JC

08-27-2020

JANE M. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLICE SGT. MIKE PARSONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DOCKET NO. 14]

The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the July 27, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation").

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. the Request of the City of Fountain Valley (on behalf of itself and the individual defendants in their official capacities) (collectively "Moving Defendants") for Judicial Notice is denied;

2. the Moving Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Complaint and punitive damages request as against the Moving Defendants; ///

3. the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend as against the Moving Defendants and the punitive damages request is dismissed with prejudice as against the Moving Defendants;

4. within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall do one of the following:

(a) file a First Amended Complaint which cures the defects identified in the Report and Recommendation;

Any First Amended Complaint must: (a) be labeled "First Amended Complaint"; (b) be complete in and of itself and not refer in any manner to the original Complainti.e., it must include all claims on which plaintiff seeks to proceed (Local Rule 15-2); (c) contain a "short and plain" statement of each claim for relief "showing that [plaintiff] is entitled to relief" (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)); (d) make each allegation "simple, concise and direct" and contain factual allegations in clear short, concise, numbered paragraphs, each "limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances" (Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1), 10(b)); (e) set forth clearly the sequence of events giving rise to the claim(s) for relief; (f) reflect which claims are brought against which defendant(s) in which capacity and allege specifically what each defendant did and how that individual's conduct specifically violated plaintiff's civil rights; and (g) not add defendants or claims that are not related to the claims asserted in the original Complaint.

(b) file a Notice of Dismissal which will result in the voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice; or

(c) file a Notice of Intent to Stand on Complaint, indicating plaintiff's intent to stand on the original Complaint despite the pleading defects therein that were identified in the Report and Recommendation, which may result in the dismissal of this action in its entirety based upon such defects as against the Moving Defendants; and

Plaintiff is cautioned that her failure timely to file a First Amended Complaint, a Notice of Dismissal, or a Notice of Intent to Stand on Complaint may be deemed plaintiff's admission that amendment is futile, and may result in the dismissal of this action with or without prejudice as against the Moving Defendants on the grounds identified in the Report and Recommendation and/or on the ground that amendment is futile, and/or dismissal of this action

with or without prejudice as against all defendants for failure diligently to prosecute and/or for failure to comply with the District Judge's Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order on plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: August 27, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Murray v. City of Fountain Valley Police Sgt. Mike Parsons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 27, 2020
Case No. 8:19-cv-0768-GW-JC (C.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Murray v. City of Fountain Valley Police Sgt. Mike Parsons

Case Details

Full title:JANE M. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY POLICE SGT. MIKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. 8:19-cv-0768-GW-JC (C.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2020)