From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. City of Daytona Beach

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 29, 2024
6:23-cv-1489-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

6:23-cv-1489-RBD-RMN

04-29-2024

CHANTAL P. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Defendant.


ORDER

ROY B. DALTON, JR. United States District Judge

Before the Court is the parties' Joint Motion and Stipulation to Approve Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs to Plaintiff. (Doc. 24 (“Motion”).) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Norway entered a Report and Recommendation stating that the Court should grant the Motion. (Doc. 27 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The R&R (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.

2. The Motion (Doc. 24) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff is AWARDED $10,442.00 in attorney's fees and costs.

4. The file is to remain closed.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murray v. City of Daytona Beach

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 29, 2024
6:23-cv-1489-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Murray v. City of Daytona Beach

Case Details

Full title:CHANTAL P. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

6:23-cv-1489-RBD-RMN (M.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2024)

Citing Cases

Provitola v. Comer

In considering the Johnson factors-specifically, the last factor of awards in similar cases-the Court finds…