From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray v. Christensen

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma
Feb 6, 2006
Case No. C04-5758FDB (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. C04-5758FDB.

February 6, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER


On May 31, 2005, the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff then moved for relief from judgment on November 1, 2005 owing to the number of moves he had made and the fact that his mail was not forwarded. Plaintiff's motion was granted, and he was given a new date to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the RR as well as a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, and a reply to Defendants' motion for summary judgment.

Considering Plaintiff's responses as his objections to the RR, the Court concludes that the Order adopting the Report and Recommendation must stand. Plaintiff's arguments present general legal principles and his bare factual assertions, and these are insufficient to rebut the conclusions presented by the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Court reaffirms its Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 27];

2. Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [Dkt. # 39] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Murray v. Christensen

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma
Feb 6, 2006
Case No. C04-5758FDB (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2006)
Case details for

Murray v. Christensen

Case Details

Full title:MARK T. MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID CHRISTENSEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma

Date published: Feb 6, 2006

Citations

Case No. C04-5758FDB (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2006)