Murray v. Anderson

Full title: JAMES MICHAEL MURRAY v. WARDEN ANDERSON, ET AL.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 27, 2020

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0825 SECTION P (W.D. La. Jul. 27, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-0825 SECTION P

07-27-2020

JAMES MICHAEL MURRAY v. WARDEN ANDERSON, ET AL.

JUDGE TERRY A. DOUGHTY

MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 7] having been considered, together with the written objection [Doc. No. 9] thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff James Michael Murray's claims that defendants violated LA. REV. STAT. § 15:760, and the Louisiana Constitution are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's right to raise them before a state court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's claims on behalf of other inmates are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing and as frivolous.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failing to state claims on which relief may be granted.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 27^th day of July, 2020.

/s/_________

TERRY A. DOUGHTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE