From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murray Rubber Co. v. Trenton

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
144 A. 920 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided February 4, 1929.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 103 N.J.L. 43.

For the appellant, James J. McGoogan.

For the respondents, Charles E. Bird and Frederic R. Brace.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Murray Rubber Co. v. Trenton

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 4, 1929
144 A. 920 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

Murray Rubber Co. v. Trenton

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY RUBBER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF TRENTON AND COUNTY OF MERCER…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 4, 1929

Citations

144 A. 920 (N.J. 1929)
144 A. 920

Citing Cases

Kidde Manufacturing Co. v. Bloomfield

It is appropriate at this point to digress from the factual narrative and consider the argument of the…

Bd. of Ed. of Manasquan v. N.J. Dept. of Transp

There is no support in Kidde for the abstract proposition that a lower owner on a stream may not, merely by…