In Murray Hill Bank v. Van Antwerp (21 N.Y. St. Repr. 377) "findings of fact by the court are not to be disturbed on appeal unless unsupported by or clearly against the weight of evidence.
Summary of this case from Baird v. SheehanSubmitted June 5, 1891
Decided June 23, 1891
Samuel Untermyer for appellant.
William C. Beecher for respondents.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Murray Hill Bank v. Van Antwerp (21 N.Y. St. Repr. 377) "findings of fact by the court are not to be disturbed on appeal unless unsupported by or clearly against the weight of evidence.
Summary of this case from Baird v. SheehanFull title:THE MURRAY HILL BANK, Appellant, v . ELIZABETH VAN ANTWERP et al.…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 23, 1891
In Shailer v. Corbett (15 N.Y. Supp. 875) that where there is a direct conflict in the evidence, the…