From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Zink

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 29, 1948
57 A.2d 388 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Submitted October 31, 1947 —

Decided January 29, 1948.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 136 N.J.L. 235.

For the appellant, Walter D. Van Riper, Attorney-General.

For the respondent, Milton, McNulty Augelli ( Anthony T. Augelli, of counsel).


The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Burling in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, DONGES, HEHER, COLIE, EASTWOOD, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Zink

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 29, 1948
57 A.2d 388 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Murphy v. Zink

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD A. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. HOMER C. ZINK, ETC., APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 29, 1948

Citations

57 A.2d 388 (N.J. 1948)
57 A.2d 388

Citing Cases

Red Bank Regional Education Ass'n v. Red Bank Regional High School Board of Education

" We believe such an effort to be particularly unrewarding here, if for no other reason than that while "or"…

Mathews v. Finley

Department hardly signifies "State" here. As for the term "tax levy" appearing in this statute, it might be…