From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc. [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 20, 2000)

Opinion

January 20, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered on or about September 14, 1998, which directed counsel for defendants Westinghouse Canada, Inc. and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, to pay $5,000 to plaintiffs as a sanction for noncompliance with court-ordered discovery, unanimously modified, on the facts, to reduce the sanction to $1,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

James C. De Norscia, for defendants-appellants.

NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, LERNER, RUBIN, SAXE, JJ.


In view of counsel's failure to seek an extension of the court-ordered discovery deadline until after the deadline's expiration and plaintiff had moved for sanctions, the motion court was justified in concluding, in the absence of any explanation by defense counsel of their conduct, that counsel's noncompliance with the court's discovery schedule had been willful, thus warranting the imposition of a monetary sanction. The amount of the sanction, however, is excessive, and we modify accordingly.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc. [1st Dept 2000

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 2000
(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 20, 2000)
Case details for

Murphy v. Westinghouse Canada, Inc. [1st Dept 2000

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MURPHY, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WESTINGHOUSE CANADA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2000

Citations

(N.Y. App. Div. Jan. 20, 2000)