From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Wakelee

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 10, 1997
704 A.2d 805 (Conn. 1997)

Opinion

Decided December 10, 1997


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 425 (AC 15849), is, on reconsideration, granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding the parties' burden of proof with respect to the duties of the defendant fiduciary?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

A. Paul Spinella, in support of the petition.

James E. Coyne, in opposition.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Wakelee

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 10, 1997
704 A.2d 805 (Conn. 1997)
Case details for

Murphy v. Wakelee

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE MURPHY, CONSERVATOR (ESTATE OF PAUL SYLVAN) v. GEORGE WAKELEE

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 10, 1997

Citations

704 A.2d 805 (Conn. 1997)
243 Conn. 956

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Wakelee

We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate…