From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG

06-03-2021

SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., dba SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE TAXPAYER ADVOCATE, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF No. 2.)

Plaintiff Shannon O. Murphy Esq. Sr., dba S heetmetal & Associates (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this action. (ECF No. 1.) On June 1, 2021, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4. ) Plaintiff has made the requisite showing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, his application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.

As to the status of the complaint, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court must conduct an initial review of a pro se complaint filed in forma pauperis to determine whether it is legally sufficient under the applicable pleading standards. The Court must dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, if the Court determines that the complaint is legally frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If the Court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim, leave to amend may be granted to the extent that the deficiencies in the complaint can be cured by amendment. The complaint will be screened in due course and Plaintiff will be served with the resulting order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 3, 2021
1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Murphy v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., dba SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00870-NONE-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)