Murphy v. Target Corporation

Full title: SHELLEY MURPHY and KENNETH MURPHY, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 12, 2008

CIV-S-07-0177 LKK EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2008)

Opinion

CIV-S-07-0177 LKK EFB PS.

February 12, 2008

ORDER

LAWRENCE KARLTON, Senior District Judge

On November 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 27, 2007, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.