From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. State

United States District Court, D. Maine
Oct 3, 2006
Docket No. 1:06-cv-62-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2006)

Opinion

Docket No. 1:06-cv-62-GZS.

October 3, 2006


ORDER ON REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION


Before the Court are two requests for extension of time to respond to various motions by Plaintiff (Docket #s 120 122). The Court specifically reads these requests as applying to the following motions: (1) Motion to Dismiss by Pine Tree Veterinary Hospital et. al. (Docket # 99), (2) Motion to Dismiss by Town of Farmington (Docket # 103), (3) Motion to Dismiss by Lipman, Katz McKee et al. (Docket # 105), Motion to Dismiss by State of Maine Defendants (Docket # 109). In ordinary course, Plaintiff's responses to these motions would be due on October 10, 2006. The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's request for an extension of that deadline and ORDERS that Plaintiff file her responses to these above-listed motions on or before November 27, 2006.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. State

United States District Court, D. Maine
Oct 3, 2006
Docket No. 1:06-cv-62-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Murphy v. State

Case Details

Full title:CAROL MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MAINE, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Oct 3, 2006

Citations

Docket No. 1:06-cv-62-GZS (D. Me. Oct. 3, 2006)