From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Snyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2011
10-CV-1513 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

10-CV-1513 (JS) (WDW).

September 15, 2011

William Edward Vita, Esq., Westerman Ball Ederer, Miller Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, NY, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

Marc A. Greenberg, Esq., Law Office of David Watkins, Closter, NJ, Attorney for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER


In this breach of contract case, Defendants have repeatedly ignored their discovery obligations and violated the orders of Magistrate Judge William D. Wall. Judge Wall, in a Report and Recommendation dated July 28, 2011 (the "R R"), recommended that Defendants' answer be stricken and that Plaintiffs be awarded a default judgment. The time for objections has passed, and this Court finds the R R to be comprehensive, well-reasoned, and free from clear error.

Accordingly, the R R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Defendants' answer shall be stricken and Plaintiffs are awarded a default judgment. Within forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiffs shall submit to Judge Wall papers in support of their damages. Additionally, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Docket Entry 39.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2011

Central Islip, New York


Summaries of

Murphy v. Snyder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 15, 2011
10-CV-1513 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Murphy v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MURPHY and NANCY MURPHY, Plaintiffs, v. STUART SNYDER, DOREEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

10-CV-1513 (JS) (WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Murphy v. Snyder

Throughout 2011, Defendants failed to comply with multiple court orders pertaining to their discovery…

Murphy v. Snyder (In re Snyder)

The district court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety, and sent the matter back to the…