From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
1:22-cv-01362 (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01362

05-20-2022

JAMES MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. RIEDELL SHOES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

A review of court records indicates that the complaint in this action was filed on February 17, 2022, and that no proof of service of the summons and complaint has been filed. Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court - on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff - must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.

The plaintiff is directed to serve the summons and complaint on the defendant on or before June 17, 2022. If service has not been made on or before June 17, 2022, and if plaintiff fails to show cause, in writing, why service has not been made, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
1:22-cv-01362 (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Riedell Shoes, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. RIEDELL SHOES, INC., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-01362 (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)