From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Peterson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 13, 1924
123 Misc. 945 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)

Opinion

November 13, 1924.

Sillcocks, Gedney Holmes ( Henry Sillcocks, of counsel), for the appellant.

Joseph H. Hayes, for the respondents.


The refusal of the trial judge to charge the jury in accordance with our decision in Markwin Realty Corp. v. Geisler, 122 Misc. 697; affd., 210 A.D. 845, that the space occupied by the stores in the premises should be considered in determining a reasonable rental as so much apartment space and chargeable only with the rent which would be reasonable for such apartment space, was error and requires a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with twenty dollars costs to appellant.

All concur; present, GUY, BIJUR and MULLAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Peterson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 13, 1924
123 Misc. 945 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
Case details for

Murphy v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS PIERCE MURPHY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v . JOSIE PETERSON, HENRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1924

Citations

123 Misc. 945 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
206 N.Y.S. 580