From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Mounts

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Mar 13, 2000
99 Wn. App. 1063 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

In Mounts v. Murphy, 126 Ky. 803, 804, 104 S.W. 978, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 1192, an action was brought on a bond executed by a plaintiff to obtain possession of some oxen and their accoutrements according to the terms of Section 184 of the Civil Code of Practice.

Summary of this case from Stimson's Ex'x v. Tharp

Opinion

No. 44227-9-I.

March 13, 2000. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-2-03200-4, David F. Hulbert, J., entered March 8, 1999.


Reversed by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Agid, A.C.J., and Ellington, J.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Mounts

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Mar 13, 2000
99 Wn. App. 1063 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

In Mounts v. Murphy, 126 Ky. 803, 804, 104 S.W. 978, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 1192, an action was brought on a bond executed by a plaintiff to obtain possession of some oxen and their accoutrements according to the terms of Section 184 of the Civil Code of Practice.

Summary of this case from Stimson's Ex'x v. Tharp
Case details for

Murphy v. Mounts

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK W. MURPHY ET AL., Respondents , v. LORETTA MOUNTS, ET AL.…

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Mar 13, 2000

Citations

99 Wn. App. 1063 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
99 Wash. App. 1063

Citing Cases

Stimson's Ex'x v. Tharp

In Rogers v. Bradford, supra, it was held that the trial court properly overruled plaintiff's motion to…

Gust v. Edwards Co.

We cannot agree with counsel for respondent that what was said by Mr. Justice BURNETT in the Peacock case was…