From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Markis

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 888 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided April 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 153.

Messrs. Cole Cole, for the appellants.

Messrs. Bourgeois Coulomb, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Markis

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 888 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Murphy v. Markis

Case Details

Full title:JOHN MURPHY et al., appellants, v. WILLIAM HENRY MARKIS, respondent

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 888 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Stothers v. Flieger

Ordinarily where a bequest or devise is made to a named beneficiary who is, additionally, referred to as "my…

Matter of Will of Reilly

The adoption of N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14 in 1977 created a dramatic exception to the long standing policy of this…