From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion to change venue from Queens County to Suffolk County is denied.

Impleading a municipality as a third-party defendant does not render improper venue previously designated in a proper county other than the one in which the municipality is situated ( see, Holmes v. Greenlife Landscaping, 171 A.D.2d 916; Vigliotti v Executive Land Corp., 183 A.D.2d 710). Rather, the municipality's sole recourse is to seek a discretionary change of venue under CPLR 510(2) or (3) ( see, Holmes v. Greenlife Landscaping, supra). Here, the third-party defendant Town of Huntington failed to demonstrate how its potential witnesses would in fact be inconvenienced if a change of venue were not granted and thus has failed to establish entitlement to relief pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) ( see, O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 A.D.2d 169, 173).

Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Murphy v. Long Island Rail Road

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MURPHY et al., Appellants, v. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, Defendant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 206

Citing Cases

Wager v. Pelham Union Free Sch. Dist.

ovisions contain what appear to be mandatory dictates as to the placement of venue ( seeCPLR 504 [actions…

Small v. Chrysler Corp.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant…