From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Lockhart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 13, 2011
Case Number 10-11676 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number 10-11676

10-13-2011

TIMOTHY MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. SEAN LOCKHART, CFA Administrative Assistant, THOMAS BIRKETT, SMF Warden RAY BOWERSON, Resident Unit Manager, MICHAEL KRAJNIK, Resident Unit Manager, SARAH BEARSS, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, KENNETH WERNER, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor, CHERYL BERRY, General Office Assistant/Mailroom Clerk, CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, LMF Warden, and JERI-ANN SHERRY, Regional Prison Administrator, Defendants.


Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk

Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

On August 25, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion for Clerk's entry of default against defendant Werner and Sherry based on their failure to plead or otherwise defend against his administrative-segregation due process claim. The plaintiff's motion is premature and will be denied. Because the case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson to ready the matter for trial, the Court will temporarily withdraw the case reference, deny the plaintiff's motion, and re-instate the order referring the case to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that, "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Entry of default, of course, is not proper until the time allowed for filing a responsive pleading has passed. See Bluegrass Hosiery, Inc. v. Speizman Indus., Inc., 214 F.3d 770, 773 (6th Cir. 2000); Jackson v. Law Firm of O'Hara, Ruberg, Osborne and Taylor, 875 F.2d 1224, 1230 (6th Cir. 1989).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 establishes the deadlines for filing an answer to a complaint. When a defendant files a dispositive motion before filing an answer, the defendant's deadline for filing an answer is extended until fourteen days after the defendant's receipt of notice that the Court has adjudicated the defendant's motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A). The Court entered its order granting in part and denying part the defendants' motion for summary judgment on September 30, 2011. Defendants Werner and Sherry have until October 14, 2011 to file an answer to the plaintiff's complaint. The plaintiff's motion for entry of default is premature and, therefore, will be denied.

Accordingly, it ORDERED that the order referring this case to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson for general case management [dkt. # 14] is TEMPORARILY VACATED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for Clerk's entry of default [dkt. #85] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that the order referring this case to Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson for general case management [dkt. #14] is RE-INSTATED.

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on October 13, 2011.

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Murphy v. Lockhart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 13, 2011
Case Number 10-11676 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Murphy v. Lockhart

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. SEAN LOCKHART, CFA Administrative Assistant…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

Case Number 10-11676 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 13, 2011)