From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Joline

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1909
62 Misc. 461 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)

Opinion

March, 1909.

W.L. Cannon, for appellant.

Anthony J. Ernest, for respondents.


The learned trial justice, having had before him all the witnesses, was of opinion and decided, after opportunity for full consideration of the evidence and the law, that the verdict for the plaintiff was contrary to the weight of evidence and to the law, announcing his decision October 13, 1908. Thereon he signed, December 19, 1908, an order presented by the defendants from which, however, was omitted setting down the case for trial at a time specified, as required by section 254 of the Municipal Court Act, and so was unauthorized. 25 Misc. 338; 32 id. 694. This is the order appealed from. It must be reversed.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, MACLEAN and DAYTON, JJ.

Order reversed, with costs.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Joline

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1909
62 Misc. 461 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)
Case details for

Murphy v. Joline

Case Details

Full title:MARY ETTA MURPHY, Appellant, v . ADRIAN H. JOLINE AND DOUGLAS ROBINSON, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1909

Citations

62 Misc. 461 (N.Y. App. Term 1909)
115 N.Y.S. 108

Citing Cases

Epstein v. Schwartz Co.

Such an omission has been held to render the order unauthorized. Murphy v. Joline, 62 Misc. 461, 63 id. 256.…

De Leon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford

He must also set a date for the new trial. ( Murphy v. Joline, 62 Misc. 461.) He has no power, after setting…