Murphy v. Hoenigmann

Full title: JOSEPH H. MURPHY, JR., AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LUCILLE…

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 31, 1988

525 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1738.

May 31, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Murray Goldman, Judge.

Murphy Parente and Joseph H. Murphy, Coral Gables, for appellant.

J. Bill Ullman, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court's decision is supported by substantial, competent evidence, we affirm the Final Judgment. See Brown v. Taylor, 500 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. Vining, 334 So.2d 647 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); In re Estate of Agardy v. Dunn, 293 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); McDonough v. Rudisill, 229 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1970); Carberry v. Foley, 213 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 222 So.2d 750 (Fla. 1969).

Affirmed.