From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Grochowski

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 3:18-1404 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:18-1404

09-28-2022

DAVID N. MURPHY, SR., Plaintiff v. SCOTT M. GROCHOWSKI, et al., Defendants


MANNION, D.J.

ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

As set forth in the Memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

(1) Judge Schwab's report and recommendation, (Doc. 153), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;

(2) the motion for summary judgment of defendants PSP Sergeant Mark Rowlands and PSP Corporal John Chulock, (Doc. 140), regarding the merits of the 4 Amendment claim against them raised in the plaintiff's amended complaint, (Doc. 16), is DENIED;

Amendment claim against them on the basis of qualified immunity; and 1

(3) the motion for summary judgment of defendants Rowlands and Chulock is DENIED with respect to the plaintiff's 4

(4) by separate Order, the court will refer this matter for mediation. 2


Summaries of

Murphy v. Grochowski

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 3:18-1404 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Grochowski

Case Details

Full title:DAVID N. MURPHY, SR., Plaintiff v. SCOTT M. GROCHOWSKI, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:18-1404 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)