From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Gallery

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 16, 2022
21-cv-10566 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-10566 (MKV)

03-16-2022

JAMES MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. KOHN GALLERY, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge:

The Court is in receipt of letters stating that the parties have reached a settlement [ECF Nos. 11, 12]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's calendar if the application to restore the action is made by April 16, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today's dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines are adjourned sine die.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Gallery

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 16, 2022
21-cv-10566 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Gallery

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. KOHN GALLERY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

21-cv-10566 (MKV) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)