From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Fairmont Care Center

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 7, 2008
No. 08 C 2027 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. 08 C 2027.

August 7, 2008


MEMORANDUM


This Court has patiently (and repeatedly) sought to explain to pro se plaintiff Dorothy Murphy ("Murphy") its denial of her efforts to obtain new pro bono counsel to replace the originally appointed counsel — most recently in its August 4, 2008 memorandum order. Nonetheless Murphy persists in those efforts in the face of this Court's express orders and those explanations, most recently by having improperly presented a renewal of her motion to this District Court's emergency judge and — even more disturbingly — by continuing to abuse this Court's staff.

This Court has no desire to have Murphy's (or any other litigant's) lawsuit resolved other than on the merits. But this memorandum is issued to warn Murphy that if she persists further in her scofflaw activity, her action will be dismissed with prejudice as a sanction for having done so.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Fairmont Care Center

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 7, 2008
No. 08 C 2027 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Murphy v. Fairmont Care Center

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. FAIRMONT CARE CENTER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

No. 08 C 2027 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 7, 2008)