Opinion
Argued January 13, 1922
Decided January 31, 1922
Michel Kirtland for appellant.
Sydney A. Syme for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Murphy v. Eighth Avenue Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 31, 1922
134 N.E. 592 (N.Y. 1922)
Summaries of
Murphy v. Eighth Avenue Railroad Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 31, 1922
134 N.E. 592 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for
Murphy v. Eighth Avenue Railroad Company
Case Details
Full title:JANE MURPHY, as Administratrix of the Estate of CORNELIUS MURPHY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 31, 1922
Citations
134 N.E. 592 (N.Y. 1922)
134 N.E. 592