From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:19-cv-01422-MCE-AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01422-MCE-AC P

06-09-2021

MONRELL D. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, Defendant.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 16, 2021, ECF No. 8, are ADOPTED in full.
2. The complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.
3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:19-cv-01422-MCE-AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Murphy v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:MONRELL D. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. RALPH DIAZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-01422-MCE-AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)