From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Dauphin Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 2022
1:21-cv-01237 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01237

03-08-2022

HOLLY MURPHY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Matthew Baraniak, Plaintiff v. DAUPHIN COUNTY, et al., Defendants


ORDER

Yvette Kane, District Judge

AND NOW, on this 8th day of March 2022, upon consideration of the motions to dismiss filed by Dauphin County (Doc. No. 10) and River Drive Service Center, Inc., James Ellerman, and Shane Staley (“River Drive Defendants”) (Doc. No. 16), and in accordance with the Memorandum entered concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Dauphin County's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is GRANTED, and Count I of Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

2. The River Drive Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED IN PART to the following extent:

a. Plaintiff's federal claims asserted against Defendant River Drive Service Center, Inc., in Count II of her complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
b. Plaintiff's state law claims asserted against all of the River Drive Defendants in Counts III, IV, and V of her complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
c. The River Drive Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied in all other respects; and

3. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order and only as to Counts I and II of her complaint, correcting the pleading deficiencies identified in the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Dauphin Cnty.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 2022
1:21-cv-01237 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Dauphin Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:HOLLY MURPHY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Matthew Baraniak…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01237 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2022)