From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Crecco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 2, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, expert testimony with regard to the significance of the force of the impact between the two vehicles involved in the subject accident was not necessary since this is a matter within the ordinary knowledge and experience of the trier of the facts (see generally, De Long v. County of Erie, 60 N.Y.2d 296, 307; Matott v. Ward, 48 N.Y.2d 455, 459).

Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Crecco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 2, 1998
255 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Murphy v. Crecco

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN MURPHY, Appellant, v. JOHN E. CRECCO et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 300 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 418

Citing Cases

Vaglica v. Homeyer

The issue raised on the appeal from that order is brought up for review and has been considered on the appeal…

Knight v. Holland

Contrary to defendants' contention, the evidence is legally sufficient to support the jury's liability…