From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Creative Foods Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1991
170 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 4, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs are not foreclosed from bringing the instant action in light of the recent case of Santangelo v State of New York ( 71 N.Y.2d 393). It is now well established that a police officer cannot recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of the negligence that created the occasion for his services (Santangelo v State of New York, supra; Dawes v Ballard, 163 A.D.2d 508; Wynne v Tullman, 151 A.D.2d 476). In this case, the injured plaintiff, a police officer, alleged that as he chased a robber he sustained injuries when he fell on a defective sidewalk. Therefore, an issue of negligence was raised, separate and apart from the act which occasioned the officer's services (see, Starkey v Trancamp Contr. Corp., 152 A.D.2d 358; see also, Burnside v City of New York, 144 Misc.2d 183). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Creative Foods Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 4, 1991
170 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Murphy v. Creative Foods Corporation

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD MURPHY et al., Respondents, v. CREATIVE FOODS CORPORATION et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 4, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
565 N.Y.S.2d 229

Citing Cases

Zigo v. 1172 Anderson Corp.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff contradicted Fazio's claim that he was deliberately injured by a…

Rubsam v. Alexander

After investigating this report and finding nothing, he proceeded to his stakeout position. Rather than…