From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Correctional Medical Services

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 10, 2005
File No. 1:04-CV-71 (D. Vt. Aug. 10, 2005)

Opinion

File No. 1:04-CV-71.

August 10, 2005


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed July 21, 2005 (Doc. 96). In addition to the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's pro se complaint, viewed liberally, may encompass medical needs allegedly occurring after the prior actions and, therefore, would not be subject to dismissal on res judicata grounds. See Stephen v. Prunty, 46 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 1995) (table). After de novo review and over objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 80) is DENIED. Although the document entitled "Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 84) is a response to the defendants' motion, to the extent the filing is a motion and requires a ruling, the motion is DENIED.

This matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Correctional Medical Services

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Aug 10, 2005
File No. 1:04-CV-71 (D. Vt. Aug. 10, 2005)
Case details for

Murphy v. Correctional Medical Services

Case Details

Full title:PAUL L. MURPHY, Plaintiff v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, CATHY BEAN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Aug 10, 2005

Citations

File No. 1:04-CV-71 (D. Vt. Aug. 10, 2005)