From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Cleveland Cnty.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 4, 2022
1:21-cv-5-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-5-MOC-DSC

02-04-2022

DANTE MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. CLEVELAND COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS MATTER is before the court on Plaintiff's Objection (#55) to the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to County of Cleveland, and Motion for Sanctions against Cleveland County Commissioner Doug Bridges for Witness Tampering, Bribery, Extortion. (#51).

Finding that the magistrate judge's decision is wholly consistent with current case law, the Court will overrule Plaintiff's Objection and affirm the magistrate judge's Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (#55) is OVERRULED, and the Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment as to County of Cleveland, and Motion for Sanctions against Cleveland County Commissioner Doug Bridges for Witness Tampering, Bribery, Extortion (#51) is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Cleveland Cnty.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division
Feb 4, 2022
1:21-cv-5-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Cleveland Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DANTE MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. CLEVELAND COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-5-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Feb. 4, 2022)