From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 30, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered February 4, 1999, dismissing the complaint pursuant to a prior order that granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pro Se, for Plaintiff-Appellant

Stephen J. McGrath, for Defendant-Respondent.

TOM, J.P., ELLERIN, WALLACH, RUBIN, SAXE, JJ.


We assume in plaintiff's favor that he did not lose standing to maintain this action by reason of the subsequent appointment of an article 81 guardian for him (see, Mitsinicos v. New Rochelle Nursing Home, 258 A.D.2d 630), but nevertheless affirm on the ground of res judicata. The relief plaintiff seeks, namely, reinstatement to his former position as a police officer, could have been sought in the prior action brought by his guardian that culminated in a settlement annulling plaintiff's resignation from the Police Department and retiring him with ordinary disability benefits (see, Ionescu v. Brancoveanu, 246 A.D.2d 414, 416).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Murphy v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Murphy v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:James P. Murphy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The City of New York…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 30, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

Murphy v. City of N.Y.

The petitioner's Civil Service Law § 75–b claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, as the claim was…