Murphy v. City of Detroit

Full title: CHESTER MURPHY Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF DETROIT, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan

Date published: Jul 18, 2011

Case No. 11-10822 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 11-10822.

July 18, 2011

GREGORY J. ROHL (P39185), JAMES H. DUFF (P35562), Attorneys for Plaintiff, Novi, MI.

JERRY ASHFORD (P47402), JOHN SCHAPKA (P36731), Attorneys for City of Detroit, Detroit, Michigan.

ORDER

GEORGE STEEH, District Judge

Upon the filing and reading of Plaintiff's Motion to extend the dates for service of process and for substituted service and the Court being fully advised on the premises, says:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Summons and/or the date within which to properly serve the Defendant, Officer Christopher Muklewicz, be extended for 120 days;

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for substituted service is hereby GRANTED and that substituted service must provide for service by all four of the following means:

a. First Class Mail to Defendant's last known address;

b. By Certified Mail, return receipt requested and delivery restricted to the addressee to Defendant's last known address;

c. Posting or tacking at Defendant's last known address;

d. Publishing in the legal news of the County where Defendant resides for (3) consecutive weeks.