Opinion
March 20, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability as to his first cause of action, which he identified in his affirmation in support of the motion as alleging "intentional interference with economic relations by the unlawful means of wrongful discharge".
We address only the narrow issue presented, namely, whether the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion "without prejudice to renewal after completion of discovery". Based upon this record and taking note of one of our prior decisions in this case (see, Murphy v. Capone, 120 A.D.2d 714), the Supreme Court's determination was correct. Bracken, J.P., Spatt, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.