From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 376 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Argued May 19, 1938 —

Decided September 16, 1938.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 119 N.J.L. 537.

For the respondent, Thomas W. Parsonnet.

For the appellant, James F.X. O'Brien.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners, Newark

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 16, 1938
1 A.2d 376 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners, Newark

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT J. MURPHY, RESPONDENT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 16, 1938

Citations

1 A.2d 376 (N.J. 1938)
1 A.2d 376

Citing Cases

De Muro v. Sullivan

Plaintiffs admit that before Kagan v. Caroselli, 30 N.J. 371 (1959) and Tumulty v. Jersey City, 57 N.J.…

Pashman v. Friedbauer

The sole issue is whether plaintiff Pashman or defendant Friedbauer holds a valid appointment, and a mere…