From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 4, 2015
No. 1:15-cv-116-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:15-cv-116-DPM

11-04-2015

LISA RYAN MURPHY, ADC #760343 PLAINTIFF v. JIMMY BANKS, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Murphy hasn't paid the filing and administrative fees in this case. And a motion to proceed in forma pauperis would be futile because Murphy is a three-striker. Before filing this lawsuit, she had at least three cases dismissed for failing to state a claim. E.g., Murphy v. Fisk, et al., 1:15-cv-50-BSM; Murphy v. Culclager, et al., 1:15-cv-27~BSM; Murphy v. Robinson, et al., 1:15-cv-47-JM. Nothing in Murphy's new complaint suggests she's currently in imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Her complaint will therefore be dismissed without prejudice.

If Murphy wants to pursue this case, then she must pay $400 (the filing and administrative fees) and file a motion to reopen the case by 4 December 2015. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment will not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

4 November 2015


Summaries of

Murphy v. Banks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 4, 2015
No. 1:15-cv-116-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Murphy v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:LISA RYAN MURPHY, ADC #760343 PLAINTIFF v. JIMMY BANKS, Warden, Grimes…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

No. 1:15-cv-116-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 4, 2015)