Summary
In Murphy v. Aventis Pasteur, Inc., 270 F.Supp.2d 1368 (N.D.Ga. 2003), the district court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint where the plaintiff alleged that Eli Lilly "failed to warn consumers of the alleged dangers of thimerosal."
Summary of this case from Doe v. Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:02-CV-2257-CAP
February 26, 2003
ORDER
By an order of this court dated February 24, 2003, this court granted several motions to dismiss. As a consequence of that order several pending motions became moot. Accordingly, the ADA'S motion to disqualify [Doc. No. 19-1]; the ADA's motion to strike or disregard (Doc. No. 20-1 and 20-2]; the plaintiff's motion for leave to file [Doc. No. 23-1]; and the plaintiff's motion to strike [Doc. No. 44-1] are all DENIED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.