From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01221-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01221-AP

11-16-2012

VERNELL S. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

For Plaintiff : Robert W. Turner Steven U. Mullens, P.C. For Defendant : Daniel E. Burrows Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration, Region VIII District of Colorado


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Robert W. Turner

Steven U. Mullens, P.C.

For Defendant:

Daniel E. Burrows

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Social Security Administration, Region VIII

District of Colorado

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 5/10/12

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 5/24/12

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 10/22/12

1. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

Plaintiff's attorney has reviewed the Administrative Record, and the Administrative Records appears to be complete. Defendants' counsel also believes the Administrative Record to be complete.

2. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

No additional evidence is being submitted.

3. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.

4. OTHER MATTERS

None

5. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: December 17, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: January 16, 2013

C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: January 31, 2013

1. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

D. Plaintiff's Statement: No oral argument.

E. Defendant's Statement: No oral argument

1. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.


F. (X) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
G. () All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

1. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: ____________
Robert W. Turner
105 E Moreno
PO Box 2940
Colorado Springs, CO 80901-2940
Telephone: (719)632-5011
rwt@rwturnerlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ____________
By: Daniel E. Burrows
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
Office of the General Counsel
1001 17th St
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 844-7356
daniel.burrows@ssa.gov
Attorney for Defendant(s)


Summaries of

Murphy v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01221-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Murphy v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:VERNELL S. MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01221-AP (D. Colo. Nov. 16, 2012)