From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Allstate Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:20-cv-00753-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00753-KJM-JDP (PS)

10-26-2022

SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER

On September 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[Determinations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 15, 2021, are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; 1

3. Plaintiff's complaint and notice, ECF No. 10, is denied as moot; and

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 2


Summaries of

Murphy v. Allstate Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:20-cv-00753-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Murphy v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON O. MURPHY, SR., Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-00753-KJM-JDP (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)