Opinion
December, 1929.
Present — Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ.
Motion for reargument of motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Murphy, Inc. v. Amsterdam Building Company, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Summaries of
Murphy, Inc. v. Amsterdam Building Company, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for
Murphy, Inc. v. Amsterdam Building Company, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:THOMAS J. MURPHY, INC., Respondent, v. AMSTERDAM BUILDING COMPANY, INC.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1929
Citations
228 App. Div. 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)