From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 11-00048 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-00048 CW

11-14-2011

MARIA MURILLO, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant.


CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause be dismissed with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. The further case management conference, motion, pre-trial conference and trial dates are vacated. All pending motions are terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Murillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 11-00048 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Murillo v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA MURILLO, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-00048 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)