From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 9, 2012
NO. 14-11-00966-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 14-11-00966-CR

08-09-2012

ROBERT MURILLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1269679


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated robbery. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant's punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than fifteen (15) years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on August 11, 2011, to confinement for seven (7) years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

Although the trial court mistakenly entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that this is not a plea bargain case and the defendant has the right of appeal, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826-27 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating sentence-bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended "cap" on sentencing).

Because appellant's plea was made pursuant to a plea bargain, he may appeal only matters raised by a written pre-trial motion or with the trial court's permission. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record does not contain any adverse pre-trial rulings. The trial court's erroneous certification that the case is not a plea bargain case does not constitute permission to appeal. See Waters, 124 S.W.3d at 826-27.

The parties were ordered to file a response showing meritorious grounds for continuing the appeal or the appeal would be dismissed. No response was filed.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, McCally and Busby. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Murillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 9, 2012
NO. 14-11-00966-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Murillo v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MURILLO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

NO. 14-11-00966-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 9, 2012)