From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murillo v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 2, 2024
5:23-cv-00441-DOC-MAA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00441-DOC-MAA

04-02-2024

Jose Murillo v. Neil McDowell


Present: The Honorable MARIA A. AUDERO, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

On January 8, 2024, the Court granted Petitioner's Motion for Stay and Abeyance pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005) and ordered Petitioner to file status reports every sixty (60) days updating the Court about the progress of his habeas petitions in the California courts. (ECF No. 25, at 7.) To date, Petitioner has not filed any status report. Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 2, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. If Petitioner files a status report on or before the above date, this Order to Show Cause will be discharged, and no additional action need be taken.

Pinpoint citations in this Order reference the page numbers generated by CM/ECF headers.

Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the First Amended Petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See C.D. Cal. L.R. 41-1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Murillo v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 2, 2024
5:23-cv-00441-DOC-MAA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Murillo v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:Jose Murillo v. Neil McDowell

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 2, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00441-DOC-MAA (C.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2024)