From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murillo v. Malo's Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 24, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-714-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 24, 2015)

Opinion

Case No: 2:14-cv-714-FtM-29DNF

04-24-2015

JOSE MURILLO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MALO'S CORP., a Florida profit corporation, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #20), filed April 6, 2015, recommending that the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. #18) be granted, the FLSA Settlement Agreement and General Mutual Release (Doc. #18-1) be approved, and the case dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1112 (1983). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F. Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994) (Table).

After conducting an independent examination of the file and upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #20) is hereby adopted and the findings incorporated herein.

2. The parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement (Doc. #18) is granted and the FLSA Settlement Agreement and General Mutual Release (Doc. #18-1) is approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all deadlines and motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida, this 24th day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

JOHN E. STEELE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies:
Hon. Douglas N. Frazier
United States Magistrate Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented parties


Summaries of

Murillo v. Malo's Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION
Apr 24, 2015
Case No: 2:14-cv-714-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Murillo v. Malo's Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE MURILLO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MALO'S CORP., a Florida profit…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 24, 2015

Citations

Case No: 2:14-cv-714-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Apr. 24, 2015)