From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murdock v. Hodgens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

December, 1929.


In accordance with defendants' consent, made in open court upon the argument, order vacating judgment upon terms modified so as to require, as a further condition for vacating and setting aside the judgment, that upon the trial of this action defendants shall waive any objection that might otherwise be taken under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. Order denying motion for reargument affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Murdock v. Hodgens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1929
228 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Murdock v. Hodgens

Case Details

Full title:WARREN MURDOCK, Appellant, v. THOMAS M. HODGENS and INEZ T. HODGENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1929

Citations

228 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)