From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murchison v. Sadowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2285 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-CV-2285

02-29-2012

KENNETH MURCHISON, PLAINTIFF, v. HENRY J. SADOWSKI, et al., DEFENDANTS.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)

ORDER

NOW this 29th day of February, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt (Doc. 5) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED.
(2) Plaintiff's claim for money damages against all Defendants in their official capacities will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE .
(3) Plaintiffs constitutional claims against Defendants Sadowski and Norwood will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and these two Defendants will be dismissed entirely from the action.
(4) Plaintiff's constitutional claims against the remaining Defendants will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff will be allowed to amend the constitutional claims in his Complaint as to Defendants USP-Lewisburg Warden Bledsoe, unnamed Sort Team members, PA Potter and Dr. Pigos.
(5) This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Blewitt.

_______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Murchison v. Sadowski

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. 3:11-CV-2285 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Murchison v. Sadowski

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH MURCHISON, PLAINTIFF, v. HENRY J. SADOWSKI, et al., DEFENDANTS.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-CV-2285 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 29, 2012)