From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murberg v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jan 25, 2010
CASE NO. 8:08-CIV-936-T-17-JRK (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:08-CIV-936-T-17-JRK.

January 25, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause is before the Court on the report and recommendation (R R) issued by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt, on December 18, 2009 (Docket No. 28). The magistrate judge recommended that the Court award attorney's fees in the amount of $4,718.65, expenses in the amount of $10.64, and costs in the amount of $375.00, to be paid directly to Enrique Escarraz, III, Esquire, the plaintiff's attorney.

Pursuant to Rule 6.02, Rules of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the parties had fourteen (14) days after service to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations, or be barred from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Nettles v. Wainwright , 677 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1982) (en banc). No objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

When a party makes a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact in the report and recommendation, the district court should make a de novo review of the record with respect to that factual issue. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); U.S. v. Raddatz , 447 U.S. 667 (1980); Jeffrey S. v. State Board of Education of State of Georgia , 896 f.2d 507 (11th Cir. 1990). However, when no timely and specific objections are filed, case law indicates that the court should review the findings using a clearly erroneous standard. Gropp v. United Airlines, Inc., 817 F.Supp. 1558, 1562 (M.D. Fla. 1993). To date no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and made an independent review of the record. Upon due consideration, the Court concurs with the report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation, dated December 28, 2009 (Docket No. 28) be adopted and incorporated by reference; the Court grants the motion (Docket No. 22) and awards attorney's fees in the amount of $4,718.65, expenses in the amount of $10.64, and costs in the amount of $375.00, to be paid directly to Enrique Escarraz, III, Esquire, the plaintiff's attorney. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 in favor of plaintiff and against defendant as set out above.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Murberg v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jan 25, 2010
CASE NO. 8:08-CIV-936-T-17-JRK (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Murberg v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LEE W. MURBERG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jan 25, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 8:08-CIV-936-T-17-JRK (M.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2010)