From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murataj v. Dream Dragon Prods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2558.

April 20, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered January 28, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon renewal, granted defendant Kalatsky's motion for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action for tortious interference with contract as against him, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

White Case LLP, New York ((John D. Rue of counsel), for appellant.

Sol Kodsi, New York, for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.


Since, as the record demonstrates, there was no breach of the contract between plaintiff and his crew, plaintiff's claim of tortious interference with contract fails as a matter of law ( see Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 424; Marks v Smith, 65 AD3d 911, 916).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Murataj v. Dream Dragon Prods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 20, 2010
72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Murataj v. Dream Dragon Prods

Case Details

Full title:ANDAMION MURATAJ, Appellant, v. DREAM DRAGON PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 20, 2010

Citations

72 A.D.3d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3162
898 N.Y.S.2d 453

Citing Cases

SPV-LS LLC v. Citron

Here, Plaintiffs' claim for tortious interference with contract against Citron, Kroll, Graubard, and Fixler…

P.S. Burnham v. Irvine Realty Group

However that contract was not breached; Foresite was not obligated to buy the Building, but only to pay…