From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mur-Mil Caterers, Inc. v. Werner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1990
166 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To constitute a valid agreement for the lease of real property, the parties must have reached final agreement upon all its essential terms, without reservation of any term for future negotiations (see, Kalker v. Columbus Props., 111 A.D.2d 117). This is especially true of the amount to be paid for rent (see, Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher, 52 N.Y.2d 105). The alleged agreement states that rent was to be "predicated upon a normal increase". We find that the rent figure is not ascertainable by an objective standard, and thus the proported lease fails for indefiniteness (see, Martin Delicatessen v. Schumacher, supra). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mur-Mil Caterers, Inc. v. Werner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 1990
166 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Mur-Mil Caterers, Inc. v. Werner

Case Details

Full title:MUR-MIL CATERERS, INC., Appellant, v. WILLIAM E.F. WERNER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 565 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 849

Citing Cases

Matter of Davis v. Dinkins

The central distinguishing characteristic of a lease is the surrender of absolute possession and control of…

Vizel v. Vitale

In short, it means that a court cannot enforce a contract unless it is able to determine what in fact the…