From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2022
21-cv-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-9386 (RA)

10-25-2022

RIAASA MUNTAZ, Plaintiff, v. FAIRYGODBOSS, INC., ROMY NEWMAN, MAURA BRADLEY, and DANNA HENDRICKSON, Defendants.


ORDER

Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

The Court has been advised that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2022
21-cv-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Muntaz v. Fairygodboss Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RIAASA MUNTAZ, Plaintiff, v. FAIRYGODBOSS, INC., ROMY NEWMAN, MAURA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

21-cv-9386 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)